THE UN IPCC EXPOSED
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's own figures expose its fraud at the core of
unfounded climate alarm and government restrictions and taxes.
5,587+ lies by UN IPCC Chairman?
He said UN IPCC reports are based 100% on peer-reviewed science. Independent, international audit shows 2007 report relies on 5,587 articles not peer-reviewed - including hikers’ anecdotes, newspaper stories and political activists’ campaign material. Why?
You're here because you share our care for our planet's natural and human environments. At heart we're all green.
First world nations proudly show their care for the environment by fighting pollution.
Yet, hearing experts contradicting each other and politicians posturing to push taxes, people feel confused—some filled with fear, guilt, frustration, resentment, anger, apathy, doubt, ........
People don't know who to trust. Needing understanding, reassurance, confidence, truth, hope, clarity and security for our children's future I read thousands of pages of scientific books, journals, reports and articles. I listened to many of the world's climate experts. What I discovered is startling. It's condensed and shared here with the aim of fulfilling people's needs effectively and with ease.
Protecting our freedom and choices requires us to be conscious of freedom.
Contact federal MP's and demand they vote against any carbon tax or carbon 'trading' scheme that will raise prices and cost of living. Their contact details for calling, writing or e-mailing are at:
House of Representatives: http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/index.htm
Senators: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/senators/homepages/index.asp?sort=state
Galileo Movement
documents >
Four page summary of carbon dioxide facts
Summary of UN IPCC and Australian corruption of climate science
Four page summary of carbon dioxide facts with support material and references
Four page summary of CO2 facts with support material, references and intriguing questions
Nature; climate; UN IPCC; stirring climate alarm; conflicts of interest; forgiveness; real environmental challenges; fully referenced, 53 pages
Patterns of unscientific behaviour, fabrications and fraud; senior UN IPCC conflicts of interest; 5 page summary, 43 pages
Timeline of shady UN IPCC practices; 5 pages
Four environmental nightmares created by UN IPCC falsities; destroying freedom; polluting the human spirit; 3 pages
Millions of deaths from misguided political control; Control agenda wrapped in dark green eco-fraud; brown policies; black deaths; 8 pages
Dr Vincent Gray
UN IPCC Expert Reviewer, Dr Vincent Gray (PhD chemistry, Cambridge) has reviewed every UN IPCC Assessment Report and Summary for Policy Makers: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2007. Below are his detailed review comments on the UN IPCC's 2007 Report by chapter. His review of chapter 9 is presented first because it is the UN IPCC's chapter purporting warming due to human production of CO2. Gray has advised there is no evidence that additional human production of CO2 is harming the climate.
Review of Chapter 9
Review of Chapter 1
Review of Chapter 2
Review of Chapter 3
Review of Chapter 4
Review of Chapter 5
Review of Chapter 6
Review of Chapter 7
Review of Chapter 8
Review of Chapter 10
Review of Chapter 11
Review of Summary for Policymakers
Review of Technical Summary
General Comments
General Comments 2
Summaries
Aims, background and declaration of interests of Malcolm Roberts, Dr Vincent Gray and John McLean
Timeline of shady UN IPCC practices
Analysis of tricks used in Al Gore’s movie
Australian academic, UN IPCC Lead Author feeding off government grant has no evidence
Governments promoting coal exports want to tax Aussies using coal-fired electricity
Corruption of temperature data used by UN IPCCC
Factors driving climate
Summary of climate alarm’s 12 points
Nature completely controls CO2 levels
Climategate ‘Inquiry’ References
Acknowledgments
Contact us at Conscious
Exposing the UN IPCC using its own data on UN IPCC reporting processes.
John McLean presents statistics on UN IPCC reporting processes. As the figures were obtained from the UN IPCC they cannot be sensibly refuted. Check for yourself, it’s clear:
Author and Reviewer Numbers are Wrong
Many breaches of science in UN IPCC reviews
Apparent prejudice in UN IPCC’s work
Failures of UN IPCC scrutiny
Other McLean documents based on his detailed analysis of the UN IPCC’s work:
Climate Science Corrupted
We Have Been Conned
Why the UN IPCC should be disbanded
UN IPCC Report, 2007 (Fourth Assessment Report):
Check the 2007 report and its chapters
Read chapter 9 and see that while the wording in places could easily imply real data, the UN IPCC's core claim has no specific scientifically measured real-world evidence that human production of CO2 caused warming on Earth.
Do these academics sound like climate change
‘experts’?
Summary Findings - Notes on UN IPCC misrepresentations, the basis of government climate policy reveals how publicly prominent advocate-professors have repeatedly publicly claimed human production of carbon dioxide (CO2) caused global warming and endorsed UN IPCC midrepresentations. All have been asked to provide specific, scientifically measured real-world evidence of their claim. In their responses, all have failed to provide evidence.
All either receive government grants and/or are employed in senior positions within institutes receiving government climate grants.
Their public statements and documents (yellow links) have been challenged. Some examples follow:
E-mail to Professor Karoly promotes himself as an expert on climate yet contradicts real-world weather records.
E-mail reply to Professor England (mathematician) encapsulates global warming and UN IPCC fraud. He too contradicts real-world science yet promotes himself as a climate expert.
Professor Hoegh-Guldberg (transcript) is a marine biologist promoting himself as an expert on climate. He too contradicts real-world climate science and apparently science in his own field.
Professor Andy Pitman is a computer modeller promoting himself as an expert on climate. He hid from questions. During his retreat he made false accusations. Unsurprisingly, this is a common trick among advocates of global warming. He provides no evidence of his claims. Following are the email threads:
thread 1 | thread 2 | thread 3 | thread 4
(Note: Queensland summer time is one hour behind Pitman's state of NSW (daylight saving).
E-mail to Professor Will Steffen
Professor Flannery is reportedly an investor in an alternative energy company heavily subsidised by the government. He has been deeply involved in promoting government climate policy and on February 10, 2011 was appointed Chief Commissioner of the government's Climate Commission. His qualifications are a Bachelor of Arts (English) and a doctorate in palaeontology for his work on evolution of macropods.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, advocate-professor Flannery was publicly challenged to provide real-world evidence of human causation of warming. Flannery failed to produce any. In response, Flannery acknowledged temperatures had not risen for over a decade. Six days later Flannery reversed his position on TV when responding to biologist Jennifer Marohasy, saying that she was wrong to state "we've had no warming for ten years".
Such is the state of government's paid hands and ABC journalists' lack of scrutiny.
What about politicians?
Letter to Professor Ross Garnaut
Questions and requests for discovering climate reality ourselves
Analysis of an article by Greg Combet, Minister for Climate Change published in The Weekend Australian, Sa.26.02.11.
FREEDOM IS ESSENTIAL FOR RESPONSIBILITY | Dr Maria Montessori, arguably the greatest observer of human development based on a profound understanding of children’s and adult’s universal human needs: “Discipline and freedom are so co-related that, if there is some lack of discipline, the cause is to be found in some lack of freedom.”